
This month our editorial intern Marian Kohng interviews Tyler Hurula on her poetry collection Too Pretty for Plain Coffee. The collection explores themes of self-love, polyamory, queerness, and never apologizing for being too much. It’s a heartwarming collection and the perfect read for these frigid winter days.
Marian Kohng: What is the significance of the recurring theme of coffee and its role compared to tea and wine?
Tyler Hurula: I grew up in the Mormon church, where coffee was prohibited. Coffee has since become an indulgence, and every time I drink coffee it almost feels like I’m getting away with something. I live for seasonal coffee flavors, and adding something fun to make it extra indulgent. The title Too Pretty for Plain Coffee came from visiting a friend. I was curling my hair and getting frustrated with how much time I was taking to get ready to head out for the day, and told my friend I needed coffee. They offered to make me coffee, and I jokingly told them “I’m too pretty for plain coffee” and it just stuck. Wine also feels indulgent to me. Almost like dressing up drinking, because in my head wine is what you drink if you’re trying to be fancy about it. In the book, a partner is the one drinking tea. They don’t need it to be fancified or add extra flavors or special milk, but they see and love me for all the ways I’m “extra.”
MK: What is your process of deciding how to format certain poems and the intentionality of them to convey your message, such as in “Are You Just Being Nice, or Are We In Love?” and “One More”?
TH: Playing with the format of the poems in Too Pretty for Plain Coffee was so much fun for me. Previously, I struggled with formatting, and was determined to step out of my comfort stanzas with this book. “Are You Just Being Nice, or Are We In Love” is written as a multiple-choice quiz because of the sapphic nature of the relationship. In my experience connecting with other queer folks, a common experience in sapphic dating is wondering if someone is actually into you, or if they’re just being nice. It was my idea of not wanting to assume romantic intent, and almost a callback to slipping someone a note in elementary school saying, “Do you like me? Check yes or no.”
In “One More” I was expressing the loss of a relationship, and playing with the tension in perseverating on what would happen if there was just ‘one more’ kiss or loving gesture. Would that change anything? Would that person come back? Would they realize they missed out? It was me trying to hold onto this relationship and this person, even though they left. The repetition of “one more” in varying shades of gray are meant to represent the fading feelings as time passes. Even after those feelings have faded, something can trigger them again and revive them. I’ve often reflected on different “lasts”, and how/if things would be different if we knew it was the last time we got to kiss someone, or talk to someone on the phone, or share a meal with someone. If only I got to kiss that person one more time, would it have felt final? Could I get closure?
MK: Tell me more about the role of lipstick in your poems and the message behind intentional lipstick prints versus unintentional lipstick smudges?
TH: The more I’ve gotten to be comfortable in my own self, the more I’ve let myself love the things I love. Bright pink lipstick is one of those things and has become a staple for me. I’ve spent a lot of time and energy finding lipsticks that don’t leave residue or stains, and even the best ones still aren’t perfect. When you do start stepping into your full self more, not everyone is going to like it, and some people are going to miss the versions of you they imagined you might stay as. I am going to wear the lipstick, and I am going to be myself regardless of who likes it or doesn’t, and sometimes I might get lipstick on something I shouldn’t, or I might be too loud, or too direct, or too messy, but I’m choosing myself regardless.
MK: What did you wish to deliver through the personification in your poems, whether it is the personification of periods, anniversary cards, or being too much, and how do they relate to love for oneself?
TH: In the opening poem of the book, “I’ve Only Been Told I’m Hard to Read by People I Don’t Like,” there is a line that says, “I personified my ‘too much’ in a poem to separate myself from the reason people have left me.” Personification is one of my favorite ways to engage in poetry. Sometimes things are just too close to be able to see clearly, especially when there is a judgement attached to them. In my poem “I AM TOO MUCH FOR MOST”, I do personify my “too much” and I was able to decide how my ‘too much’ shows up in the world. I made it something outside of myself, which allowed me to learn how to love it.
I talk about polyamory in this book, which has a lot of stigma around it. In “Polyamory from the Perspective of an Anniversary Card” I’m able to address many of the negative comments I’ve gotten for being polyamorous in a way that felt accessible and not focused on any specific person. I wanted to be able to reach people that may have these negative ideas and beliefs about polyamory in a way that wasn’t accusatory, but invited them into my perspective.
As an AFAB person, I grew up being taught not to talk about my period. It is a “gross” and personal thing. I want to de-stigmatize talking about our bodies and what better way to do that than to give my period its own voice? We have so much to gain from talking about these types of things that are “taboo” or things we’re supposed to keep to ourselves like periods, polyamory, and queerness.
MK: Can you speak to me about the juxtaposition between the feelings of love and heartbreak in “Schrödinger’s Heart” and the role of this juxtaposition throughout the whole collection?
TH: “Schrödinger’s Heart” is about dating as a polyamorous person, which can be complicated when you’re breaking up with one person but still totally in love with someone else. Having those big feelings is a lot, especially when trying to navigate them at the same time. In my poem “I Can’t Love Anyone Into Loving Me,” I realize that by loving and caring about people, I could be a tender magician, even if some of those people choose not to love me back. When you date more people, there is more of a potential for heartbreak. I think choosing to love in spite of that is a really brave thing.
MK: What did you wish to convey by redacting certain parts of the letters in “Erasure Poem from a Card I Found in my Underwear Drawer” and “Letters to Ex-Lovers, Ending in One for Myself”?
TH: “Erasure Poem from a Card I Found in my Underwear Drawer” was so fun to play with. It is in direct conversation with the poem “While Cleaning Out My Underwear Drawer I Wondered When all my Underwear Became Period Underwear.” I’ve learned that I am not for everyone, and not everyone is going to love me and that’s okay. Sometimes we do just survive someone and learn more about ourselves on the other end. I think sometimes people survive us as well—even when we don’t mean to cause harm. In the past, I’ve chosen to be in relationships that don’t serve me because I want so badly to be loved. “Letters to Ex-Lovers, Ending in One for Myself” is a reminder that I will always be in a relationship with myself, and I get to choose what that looks like, and I don’t just want to survive myself.
MK: Can you speak about how you decided to structure the collection overall and start with the first poem, “I’ve Only Been Told I’m Hard to Read by People I Don’t Like,” and end it with the last poem, “Self Portrait as Someone to Love”?
TH: I started with “I’ve Only Been Told I’m Hard to Read by People I Don’t Like” because I felt like it was a good introduction to me. This whole book is about being too much—whether it’s because I’m queer, polyamorous, bisexual, a woman, etc. I wanted to explore what being “too much” looks like for me specifically, and how it manifests in my life. I wanted it to be earnest and endearing. I think parts of that poem are funny. I wanted the poem to be an invitation and a plea to see me.
The book was originally called “The Polyamory Breakup Bible,” but when I put all my poems together and read through it, I realized it was more of a love letter to myself and the parts of myself I’ve been told are “too much.” The poems in the beginning of the book are more about how other people see me. Many of the poems in the middle of the book focus on other people—they’re breakup poems, yearning poems, love poems. The end of the book is about my relationship with myself and learning to embrace all parts of me. I wanted to begin and end with myself because ultimately, I’m the only person who is stuck with me, and I’m not here to perform for anyone but myself.
MK: What is the main message you want readers to take away from your collection when experiencing the different shades of love for oneself and others?
TH: There are so many ways to love and be in relationships with ourselves and our family, friends, romantic partners, and everyone in between. Too Pretty for Plain Coffee is an invitation to explore the parts of ourselves that have been deemed unworthy, either internally or externally, and challenge them. What if the thing I’ve been told to hate about myself was actually one of the most loving and endearing things about me? What if this thing I’ve been told makes me unlovable is what someone loves most about me? Is it something I can learn to love about myself? Choosing to love and celebrate ourselves and the people in our communities is one of the most radical and brave things we can do in a world that thrives and profits from hate and division.
Too Pretty for Plain Coffee is available through Wayfarer Press & Magazine
Tyler Hurula (she/they), also known as the Pretty Pink Poet, is a poet and explorer based in Denver, Colorado. She started writing poetry at the beginning of the pandemic because she decided she needed a hobby and saw Megan Falley’s workshop “Poems That Don’t Suck” and decided to give it a try. They have since fallen in love with poetry and strive to build and grow a poetry community in the Denver Metro area. She strives to be the most queer and polyamorous person they can be and much of her poetry reflects these themes.
Their first full-length poetry collection is published through Wayfarer Books, released in April 2025. They have a poetry chapbook published with Querencia Press titled Love Me Louder and have multiple poems published in Gnashing Teeth Publishing, Fiery Scribe Review, South Broadway Press, Last Leaves Magazine, and more. Her poems have been nominated for the 2023 Best of the Net award, and the 2023 Pushcart Prize.
They host a monthly queer poetry open mic night, and facilitate poetry writing workshops.
Marian Kohng (she/her/hers) is a proud Korean American and an Editorial Intern at Sundress Publications and a Traffic Copy Editor at a local news station in Tucson, AZ. She also has a Bachelor’s in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science and a Master’s in Marketing. She loves to get lost in a good book and will read just about anything, including the back of the shampoo bottle.
















